Jamie Loeb vs Makenna Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Loeb vs M. Jones

Jamie Loeb

USA

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

1.68m

Height

571

C. Rank

614

132

Best Rank

236

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$226.3K

Career Money

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Makenna Jones

USA

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

1.68m

Height

571

C. Rank

614

132

Best Rank

236

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$226.3K

Career Money

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Head-to-head: Loeb 2 - 1 Jones

They have played 6 sets in total, with Jamie Loeb winning 5 and Makenna Jones winning 1. The last match between Jamie Loeb and Makenna Jones was at the W50 Spring, 17-02-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-0 7-6(7).

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Loeb	2
Jones	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(Q1) W50 Spring(02-17-25)

Stats

Jamie Loeb

Makenna Jones

(Q1) W75 Rome(01-27-25)

Stats

Makenna Jones

Jamie Loeb

(R1) W25 Naples(01-11-23)

Stats

Jamie Loeb

Makenna Jones

J. Loeb vs M. Jones H2H Profile

J. Loeb	Stats	M. Jones
$226,266	Career Prize Money	$0
53.91% (324-277)	Career Total W/L	58.94% (122-85)
1	Clay	0
1	Hard	0
0	Indoor	1
11	Titles	3
2	Total H2H Matches	1
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Loeb vs M. Jones Match Preview:

Second serve proficiency in recent form: In recent months, the performance on the second serve for both Loeb and Jones has been closely scrutinized. During this period, Loeb has displayed a commendable ability, triumphing in 43.86% of points on their second serve, whereas Jones has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 42.65%. It is worth highlighting that there exists a strong correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game statistics in recent form: An analysis of the return game statistics in recent times reveals interesting insights. Loeb has exhibited exceptional prowess by winning 52.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jones has also showcased their remarkable abilities by securing victories in 59.12% of such points. The statistics pertaining to first serve returns are equally intriguing, with Loeb boasting a success rate of 41.04%, juxtaposed with Jones' percentage standing at 41.92%. It is crucial to note that these figures bear a significant correlation with regards to predicting the favored contestant in their head-to-head encounter.
Performance in high-pressure situations: Another crucial aspect to consider is how these players fare under pressure. In terms of saving breakpoints, Loeb has proven to be resilient by successfully defending against 53.26% of these challenges in recent matches. On the other hand, Jones has displayed a commendable capability of saving 48.71% of breakpoints. These statistics provide valuable insights for accurate in-game betting predictions.
An overview of performance: A comprehensive overview of their performances over the past year sheds light on the relative strengths of each player. Loeb has emerged victorious in 40.82% of matches played during this period (with a win-loss record of 20 wins and 29 losses). Conversely, Jones has enjoyed a higher success rate, triumphing in 57.14% of their matches (with a win-loss record of 16 wins and 12 losses). Such data contributes to our predictive understanding of their head-to-head encounters.
Mastery of specific surfaces: It is fascinating to analyze the players' proficiency on different surfaces. Loeb has exhibited exceptional skills on the challenging Hard courts, boasting an impressive 56% win rate (with 179 wins and 138 losses). However, their performance wanes on the Grass courts, where they have managed only a 32% win rate (with 8 wins and 17 losses). Highlighting their strengths, Jones has displayed an impressive 62% win rate on Clay courts (with 48 wins and 29 losses), while facing challenges on Indoor Hard courts, with a 50% win rate (with 3 wins and 3 losses).
Player level dynamics: Analyzing the level at which these players have competed is crucial for accurate predictions. Over the past year, Loeb has predominantly participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. During this period, they have claimed victories in 41.67% of matches played (with a win-loss record of 20 wins and 28 losses). Similarly, Jones has primarily engaged in Challenger and ITF tournaments with the same prize money threshold, registering triumphs in 54.17% of matches played (with a win-loss record of 13 wins and 11 losses). When assessing player statistics to ascertain the favorite, we must also consider the relative level of the events they have competed in.
Direct head-to-head encounters: Loeb and Jones have previously met on two occasions. Remarkably, Loeb emerged victorious in one encounter, while Jones tasted success in none. In the four sets played, Loeb has emerged triumphant in three, while Jones managed to secure a win in one set. The most recent match between the two took place in the W75 Rome tournament on 27th January 2025, during the Qualifying round on Indoor Hard court. Makenna Jones clinched victory with a scoreline of 3-6, 6-4, retired.
Duration of head-to-head matches: In their previous encounters, the average duration of matches between Loeb and Jones has been recorded at 1 hour, 40 minutes, and 57 seconds.
Predicting outcomes in deciding sets: Loeb and Jones have experienced the intensity of a deciding set on one occasion. Notably, Loeb has failed to secure a victory in such instances, while Jones has emerged triumphant in one deciding set clash. This information proves invaluable when predicting the outcome should this match extend to its maximum length.
Head-to-head encounters in extreme pressure situations: Surprisingly, Loeb and Jones have never faced each other in a tiebreak situation, resulting in a complete deadlock with neither player emerging victorious.
Opponent quality statistics: Over the past twelve months, Loeb has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 450.8. In contrast, Jones has confronted adversaries with an average ranking of 351.07. These statistics provide significant insights into the level of competition faced by each player.
Deciding set performance against all players: In defining moments that lead to the climax of a match, Loeb has proven successful in winning 31% of deciding sets over the past year. Their counterpart, Jones, boasts a higher success rate, triumphing in 67% of all matches played on the tour. These statistics are particularly relevant for live predictions and betting enthusiasts.
Current event head-to-head statistics: While analyzing past performances is pivotal in predicting the outcome of tennis matches, it is equally crucial to consider current event statistics to gauge the form of the players involved. It is advisable to refer to the section below to gather insights into the performances of both players in the ongoing event (if they have already played a match). Additionally, it should be taken into account that certain players excel at specific events, influencing their chances of success.
Break point conversion: In recent matches, Loeb has showcased their ability to convert break point opportunities, successfully seizing 50.94% of chances presented to them. Likewise, Jones has demonstrated adeptness in this area, converting 47.35% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serves. These statistics prove valuable when determining live betting tips, especially when either player possesses a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are seeking models that offer predictions for tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts only)

Jamie Loeb vs Makenna Jones Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Loeb vs M. Jones H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Loeb	Stats	M. Jones
2	H2H Matches Won	0
5	Sets Won	1
35	Games Won	23
15	Aces (Total)	2
10	Total Double Faults	9
1:39:8	Average Match Time	1:39:8
55% (117/212)	1st Serve %	63% (112/178)
68% (79/117)	1st Serve Win %	54% (60/112)
49% (47/95)	2nd Serve Win %	52% (34/66)
57% (12/21)	Break Pts Won %	18% (6/34)
47% (84/178)	Return Points Win %	41% (86/212)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
67% (2/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Loeb Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W75 Sumter - 02-06-2025
R1 Unknown PlayerU. Player	L	5-7 6-4 3-1 ret.	Stats
Q3 Emily De OliveiraE. De	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Q1 Abigail RencheliA. Rencheli	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
W35 Santo Domingo - 26-05-2025
R3 Thaisa Grana PedrettiT. Grana	L	7-6(3) 6-2	Stats
R2 Mariana Isabel Higuita BarrazaM. Isabel	W	6-0 2-6 6-4	Stats

View All

M. Jones Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W75 Lexington - 28-07-2025
R1 Lea MaL. Ma	L	6-0 6-3	Stats
W100 Evansville - 21-07-2025
R2 Darja VidmanovaD. Vidmanova	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
R1 Victoria OsuigweV. Osuigwe	W	0-6 6-4 7-6(5)	Stats
Hall of Fame Open - Newport - 07-07-2025
Q3 Petra HuleP. Hule	L	6-3 5-7 6-2	Stats
W100 Cary - 30-06-2025
R1 Anna Sinclair RogersA. Sinclair	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Loeb vs M. Jones Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Loeb	Stats	M. Jones
53.91% (324/277)	YTD Win/Loss	58.94% (122/85)
53.36% (739/646)	Sets Win/Loss	56.96% (266/201)
51.27% (6503/6180)	Games Win/Loss	52.71% (2272/2038)
57.06% (190/143)	Hard Win/Loss	59.22% (61/42)
51.72% (90/84)	Clay Win/Loss	59.79% (58/39)
52.17% (36/33)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (3/3)
32.00% (8/17)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
0.24	Aces Per Game	0.03
1472	Aces Total	57
0.28	Double Faults Per Game	0.42
1745	Total Double Faults	874
1:18:23	Average Match Time	1:28:59
519.82	Average Opponent Rank	454.9
54% (17485/32413)	1st Serve %	65% (7625/11774)
65% (11351/17485)	1st Serve Win %	59% (4486/7625)
46% (6867/14927)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (1718/4149)
47% (1765/3778)	Break Points Won % (Total)	49% (768/1580)
44% (14442/33101)	Return Points Win %	48% (5479/11361)
45.71% (16/19)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
37.50% (3/5)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
42.59% (23/31)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
53.80% (255/219)	Challenger W/L	55.70% (88/70)
90.00% (27/3)	Futures W/L	72.34% (34/13)
54% (320/593)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	59% (120/203)
50% (2/4)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
45% (54/119)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (30/53)
50% (92/183)	Deciding Set Win %	59% (34/58)
83% (344/287)	1st Set Won, Won Match	91% (109/99)
16% (344/56)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (109/10)
14% (257/37)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (98/23)